Villaflor and the connection between the Baruch Lousada, Henriques Faro, Israel Pereira and (Levi) Montezinos families

 Abraham Israel Pereira, Fernando Montezinos, George Lopes Telles and David Henriques Faro were all born in Villaflor in the 1588-1610 period. David's uncle Manuel (ref 216) was also from Villaflor as was at least part of the Coutinho family - with whom the Israel Pereiras had later links (see note 11 below). The chart indicates that the New Christian community of Villaflor was in part assembled from surrounding towns and villages - eg Mirandela, Pesqueira and perhaps Vinhais the home of the Baruch Lousadas (see note 3). Some details of the Henriques Faro family are unravelled in note 2 below; the (Henriques) Faro name suggests a link with the south, and thus it may be that not all the New Christians of Villaflor originated from Spanish and then Portuguese towns near the Duoro. Further, those from the south may even have been key to the formation of the New Christian society of Villaflor, as suggested by the ancestry of Fernando Montezinos (see note 7 below). Villaflor was not however the only Portuguese town in which the New Christians gathered together and thus reconstituted their community (see note 16 below).

After Villaflor, Abraham Israel Pereira and Fernando Montezinos lived for decades as wealthy Portuguese New Christians in Madrid before making their respective escapes with fortunes more or less intact (see notes 6 and 14). Some Baruch Lousadas appeared in Madrid, indicating that the Livorno and French Baruch Lousada dispersal probably also involved Madrid (see note 14 below). The Henriques Faro trajectory, other than that family members appeared in Amsterdam and London, is even less known to us (see note 19 below). In general it can be stated that not all family members participated in each move - typically families dispersed while retaining a local presence. Thus some descendants of Amador de Lousada lived on in Vinhais (see also note 10 below) but they too fell foul of the Coimbra Inquisition around 1650 and it seems some in the next generation made a hasty retreat to London in 1698 (Jacob #51 and his family); as apparently did Moses Henriques Faro who appeared in London in 1682 (see note 1 below). Fernando Montezinos after leaving Spain remained careful of his Seville New Christian merchant sons and died a New Christian in Antwerp, thus not joining his close Lopes Telles relatives as openly Jewish in the Protestant world. Lope Rodrigues Pereira of Villaflor was tried by the Spanish Inquisition (in 1637 - see note 12 below) no doubt prompting his probable close relative Tomas to leave Madrid in good time. In Amsterdam Tomas, or Abraham as he became, funded Jewish philanthropic causes in addition to commercial pursuits, but these causes included - unfortunately - the false Messiah Sabbatai Zevi (see note 15 below). His eldest son Jacob also funded some of the same Jewish philanthropic causes (see note 17 below), having become a wealthy army supplier for Prince William of Orange (later William 3 of England), and he lived opulently at Den Haag (see ref 297 p138).

No doubt reflecting the New Christian society which flourished for a generation or two in Villaflor, Moses Baruch Lousada had 2 Henriques Faro marriages as discussed in note 1 below. More strikingly, the will (ref 141) of Jacob Israel Pereira reveals multiple links with the Baruch Lousadas of Amsterdam, Den Haag and London. Thus his father Abraham Israel Pereira was a full cousin of Abraham Baruch Lousada #45 (see note 3 below). Jacob Israel Pereira was a full cousin of Abraham Henriques Faro (see note 4 below) undoubtedly the uncle who witnessed the marriage of Sarah Baruch Lousada a daughter of Moses Baruch Lousada (see note 5 below) for Sarah's mother Rachel was a niece of Jacob Israel Pereira (see note 5 below). The will makes bequests to the daughters of Moses Baruch Lousada and Jacob #1388 (see note 5 below). And remarkably, the last wife of Jacob Israel Pereira was a Den Haag Louzada (see note 10 below) a family branch whose originator Abraham probably found a path to Amsterdam which was distinct from that via Livorno which was taken by at least some of his Baruch Lousada relatives. The chart includes all these links, though at least one significant additional link is missing (see note 21 below).

 

Notes:

1. Moses Baruch Lousada had 2 sons - Abraham and Mordecai. Moses Henriques Faro was the uncle who witnessed the 1682 circumcision of Abraham's newborn son. This son was perhaps Moses #67 (not shown in the chart but shown here and here). That is, Moses Henriques Faro was the brother-in-law of Moses Baruch Lousada #46. Moses Henriques Faro was a 'forasteiro' or outsider (perhaps a newly-arrived Portuguese). References are given here. Moses Baruch Lousada had a second Henriques Faro wife Rachel (see note 5 below).

2. Two Isaac Henriques Faros were cousins and had successive positions on Dotar (ref 151). The first Isaac (of course the one d1670 #1586) followed his father Abraham (d1658 #1175) on Dotar in 1660 and the 2nd Isaac (d1686 #1635) followed his cousin in 1671. Then the 2nd Isaac's son Abraham #1385 followed him onto Dotar in 1690. A 3rd Isaac d1719 had a father David (see burial record below) which we will see makes him a nephew of the 1st Dotar Isaac. The relationship between David Henriques Faro (see marriage and death record below) and Abraham Henriques Faro the elder can be gauged with the assistance of the 1659 will of Manuel Faro (ref 216) even though Abraham Henriques Faro who died in 1658 naturally does not appear in it. For Manuel Faro was an uncle of David and Isaac Henriques Faro, and though it is not completely known how he was related to them, notwithstanding much Amsterdam data linking the Israel Pereiras and the Henriques Faros (ref 217), he must have been an uncle by marriage and not a blood relative and the chart suggests a sister may have married Abraham Henriques Faro #1175 the father of David as well as of the 1st Dotar Isaac. Note 9 shows their marriages with David being father of both. There must have been another Henriques Faro brother (shown in the chart as Jacob #1634 but see note 20 below) whose son Isaac became the 2nd Dotar Isaac. However this Isaac #1635 did not receive a bequest presumably because he was less closely related to Manuel Faro than were David and the 1st Isaac. We note that Ines de Matos - mother of Beatriz Fernandez Gomes - came from Pesqueira which is near Lamego to the south of the Duoro. In ref 141 may be found a bequest to Esther de Matos 'niece of his deceased mother' from Jacob Israel Pereira.

3. Ref 141 shows that Abraham Israel Pereira 1606-74 was a 'cousin germain' of Abraham Baruh Lousada meaning that a parent of each was a sibling. Abraham #45 who died in 1714 in London was a probable cousin of Moses Baruch Lousada of London who died 1699 in London, and of Aaron #376 who died 1695 in Barbados; a probable half-brother of Jacob #1388 who died in 1681 in Amsterdam; but probably a full brother of David #44 who died 1699 in Amsterdam aged 59 having been born in 1640 in Livorno. On David's 1st marriage see note 21. Abraham #45 travelled between London and Amsterdam and perhaps was useful to Jacob Israel Pereira's cross-Channel business (in a way that Abraham's brother Moses #1585 of Curacao could not have been; Moses #1585 does not appear in Jacob's will despite also being similarly related to Jacob's father). The birth of Abraham Baruch Lousada appears to have been around 1635 (this falls between the 1640 birth of his brother David and the circa 1630 birth of his sister Rachel - see here note 6). Therefore the 2 Abrahams were effectively born a generation apart. The age difference suggests that Abraham Israel Pereira had a Baruch Lousada mother, though this inference is not certain (see note 13 below). We nevertheless set out to identify the parents of Abraham Israel Pereira, and this was achieved thanks to Fernando Gonzalez del Campo Roman - see ref 145 - so the mother was identified as Beatriz Geronima. On general grounds we believe Amador de Lousada was a Baruch Lousada ancestor. Amador was from Vinhais, but his Inquisition record shows he was linked to many people named Rodrigues from nearby Braganza and the more distant Villaflor. A possibility is that Amador's daughter Briatis was Beatriz Geronima but the origin of the Geronima name is one of several difficulties with that idea. As discussed here there is a somewhat simpler explanation, which we show in the chart above - a young half-sister of Beatriz Geronima married Isaac Baruch Louzada #42 the father of Abraham #45.

4. Ref 141 shows that Jacob Israel Pereira (son of Abraham Israel Pereira) was a 'cousin germain' of Abraham Henriques Faro. We know that Isaac Henriques Faro (d1686 Amsterdam) married Rebecca Pereira (d1693 Amsterdam - see their death records below). In note 5 we infer that Rebecca was a sister of Jacob (see note 8 below for her half-sister Rebecca de Pinto). Though Abraham Henriques Faro was a brother of Rachel, being a cousin of Jacob he could not have had the same parents as Rachel the niece of Jacob, though probably they had the same father Isaac. We therefore suggest, after ruling out the possibility discussed in note 18, that the first wife of Isaac was a hitherto unknown aunt of Jacob Israel Pereira. In the chart we show her as a sister of Abraham Israel Pereira but of course she could have been a sister of Beatriz Fernandez Gomes who was the mother of Jacob Israel Pereira (but of course not a sister of the 2nd wife of Abraham Israel Pereira - see note 8 below - who was not Jacob's mother!). In this way Abraham Henriques Faro was a 'cousin germain' of Jacob Israel Pereira whilst still being a brother (actually a half-brother) of Jacob's niece Rachel. We note that there were others of the same name - one older (Abraham Henriques Faro #1175 the first DOTAR representative in note 2 above) and one younger (Abraham Henriques Faro #1632 who note 9 below confirms was not the 'cousin germain' of Jacob Israel Pereira and had the wrong father to be the second DOTAR Abraham).  

5. Abraham Henriques Faro is the uncle of Sarah Baruch Lousada and he witnessed her 1709 wedding as shown in Amsterdam marriage data and is thus a brother of Moses' second (Henriques Faro) wife Rachel #1404 (on their possible previous connection see note 19). We suggest that Jacob's 'cousin germain' (see note 4) was this uncle Abraham. Simha #1629, who has a marriage record (shown below) showing a mother Rebecca Pereira and a Toralto (ie Henriques Faro) father and who also appears in her father's death record below, is a surviving niece in ref 141; Rachel predeceased her uncle Jacob (as did another possible niece Sarah #1633). From all this we infer that Rebecca was the mother of both nieces Rachel and Simha Henriques Faro, and therefore that Rebecca was Jacob's sister. The daughters (including Sarah) of Moses #46 were to receive a bequest in Jacob's initial will. We are only aware of one such daughter (ie Sarah so her sister(s) perhaps died young - the London death records do not show this but certainly show a son b1686 died young). In any case this bequest was later revoked on 3 Feb 1704 in favour of Sarah's cousins the children of Jacob Baruch Lousada #1388. Perhaps Jacob Israel Pereira belatedly realised that the unmarried Amsterdam daughters of Jacob Baruch Lousada were of greater help to him in his old age than the much younger Sarah who was then in London. But perhaps he had already contributed to Sarah's dowry, though her marriage would have been long-planned if this was so for it occurred 5 years after the revocation! We also note that the children of David #44 do not appear in the will - it is understandable that Jacob was unaware of David's Curacao daughter and David's Barbados (step-)son, but as David's Amsterdam sons married females favoured by the will it is also understandable that they were also omitted! Isaac #1297 married Rebecca (daughter of Jacob #1388), and Solomon married Sarah (daughter of Moses #46).

6. Madrid data (ref 145) gives us the origin and marriage of Abraham Israel formerly Tomas Rodrigues Pereira and also the marriage of Fernando Montezinos making him a brother-in-law. See also note 14.

7. Note that ref 153 gives the Villaflor background of the ancestors of Fernando Montezinos going back to the expulsion from Spain of 1492. Using this reference we can also see that Pedro Lopes Telles was a brother of Fernando Montezinos and also Manuel Lopes Telles; the latter, also named Manuel Serra, spent periods in La Rochelle and Hamburg before he settled in Amsterdam in 1631 (but evidently appeared in Bayonne in 1633). But Pedro Lopes Telles was an uncle of George Lopes Telles, born in Villaflor in 1607 and hence George was probably the son of Manuel Lopes Telles and of course nephew of Fernando Montezinos. However we have yet to identify how they link with the later Levi Montezinos families. See note 6 for the marriage, and see note 14 for the Madrid life, of Fernando Montezinos.

8. Another Isaac Faro #1386 who died 20 Kislev 5431 (1670) married a Rebecca Simha; though the 'Pereira' name is not used and Isaac did not show the Henriques name or one of the usual aliases of the Henriques Faros so we dismiss this pair. More confusingly a Rebecca Pereira (with father Abraham) married Jacob de Pinto #2018 - see her 1702 death record https://www.dutchjewry.org/P.I.G./image/02044601.jpg. On 7 Jun 2020 Michael Waas drawing upon ref 323 pointed out that this latter Rebecca could be a (half-)sister of Rebecca Pereira the wife of Isaac Henriques Faro and the mother of Simha de Lima. Jacob de Pinto the husband of Rebecca de Pinto is shown here in a chart comparing the ancestry of Julian Land and Michael Waas. While Rebecca de Pinto died later she probably came from the 1628 Madrid marriage of Abraham Israel Pereira shown in the chart above. Rebecca Henriques Faro must have come from a later marriage of Abraham Israel Pereira, and judging from the 1681 birthdate of her daughter Sarah Rachel was born around 1660 and hence Rebecca was born around 1640-45. Perhaps, as it appears likely that each Rebecca was the 1st daughter of each marriage, the name was a reflection of the paternal grandmother Beatriz (which is a plausible equivalent Christian name to Rebecca). In any event, Michael Waas pointed out on 6 Mar 2017 that with Jacob de Pinto and Isaac Henriques Faro appearing as witnesses in the marriage bann for the 1654 marriage of David Pereira (whose parents were dead) and Rachel Coutinho of Villaflor (mother Sarah) https://www.dutchjewry.org/sephar_tim/pers/3675pers.shtml, the family relationships are demonstrated. David was not the son, but could have been a young brother or nephew of Abraham Israel Pereira.

9. Jacob's cousin 'germain' Abraham could not have been Abraham #1632 neither of whose parents (see marriage record #3840 below) met the requirement of being a sibling of one of Jacob's parents. Abraham #1632 is described as son of David in https://www.dutchjewry.org/P.I.G./image/00992301.jpg, while his brother Isaac is shown as son of David in https://www.dutchjewry.org/P.I.G./image/01014001.jpg. On the other hand Abraham #1385 married Esther Velozinos and had a marriage witness Isaac (who we take to be his father - though this witness is erroneously described as 'zuster' in https://www.dutchjewry.org/phpr/amsterdam/tim_sephard_marriages/amsterdam_tim_sephard_marriages_view.php?editid1=2511). The banns for the latter marriage may be found here. It can be seen that while the groom's witness is Isaac he is not stated to be the father - though as a young bridegroom with a father still alive it would be a little surprising if the bridegroom's witness were not the father. The bride's witness Rachel is stated to be a sister (which may explain the error in the dutchjewry record just cited - for as shown in the chart above Abraham also had a sister Rachel!).

10. Based on our exploration of the descendants of Amador de Lousada, and because we now consider that the Den Haag Louzadas were close relative of the Baruch Lousadas, Sarah's father Isaac #50 (who married very young) appears to have been a cousin (once removed) of Jacob Israel Pereira. We suggest he was a grandson of Fernando (the 1st son of Amador de Lousada) who remained in Portugal. Perhaps the father of Isaac #50 travelled to Amsterdam via Venice (for the Den Haag Louzadas had Venice connections) as apparently did Abraham Israel Pereira.

11. See note 8 for a marriage with a groom David Pereira b1614 Lisbon and a bride Rachel Coutinho of Villaflor. Manuel Faro of Villaflor (ref 216) gave a bequest to a Coutinho. See also http://digitarq.dgarq.gov.pt/details?id=2352194 for the Coimbra Inquisition record of Ana Pereira Coutinho from Villaflor. Jacob Coutinho entered the field of supplying the Dutch army but apparently not as successfully as Jacob Israel Pereira (see ref 297 p140).

12. Our distant relative Michael Waas found a 1637 Spanish Inquisition record of the trial of Lope Rodrigues Pereira.

13. Large differences can arise in the case of children of male siblings. The birth-age range of the children of John Baruh Lousada #25 was 1833-54, while that of his brother Simeon Charles #74 was 1876-88. That is, an age-difference of such cousins of 55 years can be found. In this case John married in 1832 aged 22 and Simeon married in 1875 aged 51. Clearly age at marriage and difference in date of birth can have a big impact on relative age of cousins. In the case of the cousins Abraham Baruch Lousada #45 and Abraham Israel Pereira we show how their age difference came about taking these factors into account - see here (scroll down to note 12).

14. An account of the Madrid life of Fernando Montezinos may be found here while a brief account of the Madrid life of Tomas Rodrigues Pereira aka Abraham Israel Pereira may be found in ref 123 p230 where he is noted as having fled to Amsterdam in 1646 with disputed funds; but note a correction that it was in 1645 that he appeared in Amsterdam as Abraham Rodrigues Pereira then finally in 1647 as Abraham Israel Pereira (see ref 217). Fernando Montezinos appeared in the Inquisition records of the trial of Juan Nunez Saravia 1585-1639 (ref 142), but he survived in Madrid for almost 2 decades thereafter. For the death in Antwerp and the burial in Amsterdam of Fernando Montezinos see ref 332 p238. In ref 145 as discussed here the will of Antonio de Losada the probable son Isabel #1783 was found in Madrid; while the 2nd marriage of Isaac #42 seems to have been around 1630 in Madrid - since it was to a young sister-in-law of Abraham Israel Pereira who was in Madrid at the time (see discussion in note 3).

15. Perhaps this curious turn of events was linked to the discovery of 'lost tribes of Israel' in the region of present-day Colombia by Antonio de Luis Montezinos of Villaflor; he was also known as Aaron Levi (ref 8 pp195-211). Presumably he and Fernando Montezinos were members of the family who became known in Livorno and Amsterdam as Levi Montezinos (see note 7) and hence Abraham Israel Pereira (formerly Tomas Rodrigues Pereira) who was a brother-in-law of Fernando Montezinos (see chart and note 6) may have been a relative of the discoverer. The discovery set off Messianic excitement in the mid 1600s which no doubt enhanced Sabbatai Zevi's psychological impact on Amsterdam's Sephardic Jews! For an account of Sabbatai Zevi and his crypto-Jewish followers in the Ottoman Empire see ref 298.

16. Through analysis of Amsterdam records - especially marriage records - ref 297 shows there were a number of such towns in Portugal from which New Christians in effect gathered before departure. In its Table 2.3 covering Portuguese Jewish immigration to Amsterdam 1598-1699, Villaflor contributed 4 people which was exceeded by 13 towns, equalled by Faro, Guimares and Viana but was in excess of that provided by 27 towns. On page 99 we find the observation that those New Christians in Portugal not engaged in commerce had less information and fewer options to move away from Inquisitional interest. It seems that the availability of international links was a key factor in determining whether onward movement was to overseas destinations, to Spain, or merely within Portugal, and the Baruch Lousadas seem to have benefited by gaining international links through marriage. They thereby, in the cases relevant to us, made a transition from local tradesmen to international merchants!

17. Jacob Israel Pereira funded yeshivas as described in the following notes from Ton Tielen of 13 Apr 2019: The library Ets Haim, the oldest still functioning Jewish library in the world, holds a little brochure of a few dozen pages concerning the various legacies left by Jacob Israel Pereira. There were some gifts to Ets Haim in Amsterdam and to Aby Yetonim also in Amsterdam. The largest sum of money, however, went to two Yeshivas, Beth Yahacob in Jerusalem and Emet le Yahacob in Hebron. Jacob followed the footsteps of his father Abraham who also established two yeshivas in his name, in both Hebron and Jerusalem. In the brochure, you may find a business plan, a blueprint for the Yeshiva in Jerusalem. It looks like the same plan was intended for the Yeshiva in Hebron - but that one received only half as much money as the one in Jerusalem. The Ros of that Yeshiva was to be David Hisquiau da Silva who had made a great impression on Jacob Pereira when visiting Amsterdam as an emissary in 1691. Ros of the Yeshiva in Hebron would be Abraham Seeby. Both Yeshivas existed until well in the 20th century, yet remain largely unknown to a larger public; their history begs to be written. Ton Tielen noted that the brochure commands prayers to be said for Jacob's 2 wives Rebecca and Sarah ie that there was no intermediate wife as considered in note 18.

18. We noted that Jacob's first known wife was Rebecca de Paiva who was born in Seville in 1631 (see http://www.dutchjewry.org/phpr/amsterdam/tim_sephard_marriages/amsterdam_tim_sephard_marriages_view.php?editid1=3870), and who died in Amsterdam in 1667 (see http://www.dutchjewry.org/P.I.G./image/01990201.jpg). This left time before Jacob married his last wife Sarah Louzada (see note 10), who would not have come of age until the 1680s. Thus a 2nd wife could have been a young sister of Isaac Henriques Faro #1635 and thus a young aunt by marriage of Jacob, in which case Rachel could indeed be his niece. However this explanation has the fatal flaw recorded in note 17 above that there was no such intermediate wife.

19. The Henriques Faro trajectory may be similar to the Baruch Lousada trajectory. The 1st marriage of Moses Baruch Lousada #46 to an Henriques Faro was perhaps around 1650 in Rouen, and perhaps some of the Henriques Faro family sojourned there on their way to Amsterdam. It also seems possible if not probable that Rachel Henriques Faro was also the niece of (the first wife of) Moses Baruch Lousada himself (since both his spouses were Henriques Faros and his daughter Sarah appeared a generation after his sons Mordecai and Abraham).

20. The records do not show the name of the father of Abraham Henriques Faro #1175, but Jacob's father was Isaac (his death record https://www.dutchjewry.org/portuguese_israelite_cemetery/popup.htm?../P.I.G./image/01016201.jpg shows this), and this name reappears with Isaac #1386 and Isaac #1635 both of whom was perhaps an oldest son, thus partially confirming Abraham #1175 and Jacob #1634 were brothers. It is possible but unproven that Jacob #1634 was the father-in-law of Moses #46, in which case we can be sure that Abraham Baruch Lousada #1352 was not a 2nd son, and in any case Abraham Henriques Faro #1385 was not a 1st son!

21. David #44, brother of Abraham #45 (see chart), was first married to Hannah Montezinos #742 a Montezinos widow as shown here. Her father was Jacob Montezinos probable nephew of Jacob Montezinos #419 shown in the chart.

 
           
                     
                     
  http://www.dutchjewry.org/P.I.G./image/01014001.jpg   http://www.dutchjewry.org/phpr/amsterdam/tim_sephard_marriages/amsterdam_tim_sephard_marriages_view.php?editid1=3840     http://www.dutchjewry.org/P.I.G./image/01013601.jpg   http://www.dutchjewry.org/P.I.G./image/01039201.jpg  

https://www.dutchjewry.org/phpr/amsterdam/tim_sephard_marriages/amsterdam_tim_sephard_marriages_view.php?editid1=3300