The tree has plenty of interest, but has numerous errors. Thus the account of Moses Baruh Lousada is outmoded by what we now know. The tree makes many of the errors about Lousada genealogy that were common prior to our work eg it has Emanuel #41 of Jamaica marrying the wrong Esther. Aaron Baruh Lousada #125 did not have a son Jacob, but his father Emanuel #41 and son Emanuel #135 of course did. The chart attributes to the latter Jacob (the brother of Isaac the 1st Lousada Duke) the illustrious Fischl line in the Habsburg aristocracy whereas Jacob had a modest end to his life in Jamaica in 1800. The top entry of the the chart concerns a Don Salomon de Louzada purportedly related to the Portuguese House of Braganza and whilst the story therein is similar to the story of the Lamego in-laws the Curiels, no care seems to have been taken to clarify how he relates to the Baruch Lousadas. The parentage given of Moritz Baruh is suspect - a Lousada/Ximenes marriage which is unknown to us. The (undated) 1770 Lousada/Ximenes marriage has the wrong Lousada husband but the (undated) 1783 Lousada/Ximenes marriage shows the correct participants. There is much that is interesting about the tree, however, but the many uncritical attempts made to import Lousada ancestry are quite unconvincing and we have suggested an ancestry of Moritz Baruh where we provide a further critique.